; File processed on 2025-09-11

; J7^accum
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f7
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f8
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f9
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f10
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f11
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f12
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f16
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f17
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f19
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f20
B11	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	Buildup of natural accumulations on top of the ^bf. The layers accumulated over time and contain no use areas or structures. There are some small hardened areas (f18) and some accumulations of stones and sherds (f13, f21) but these appear to be naturally occuring rather than man-made use areas. Some large floating stones are found in this level (^flst)that may be related to late use of the area but it is unclear.
I4	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	s122-JPD
I12	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	These natural accumulations built up on top of the brickfall sometime after the area of the brickfall was abandoned and exposed, but before the construction of the second apron and other associated stone constructions of J2.
O99	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	The natural accumulations can be clearly seen on top of the brickfall in v35. They are uniform and show none of the same red color characteristic of the brickfall.

; J7^ash
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f58
B11	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	A layer of ash at the bottom of k3 that presumably extends southward. It was only recorded in section (see v37). It was not excavated so it can no be dated clearly but it appears to be the same as the ash in J6.
I4	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	s161-JPD
I10	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	No ceramics were collected from this feature as it was only exposed, not excavated, therefore this strata is assigned based solely on stratigraphy.
I12	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	Because this ash is immediately followed by the brickfall it must have happened at nearly the same time. It is possible that the ash comes from fire or destruction that precipitated the brickfall.

; J7^bf
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f12
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f42
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f43
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f44
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f46
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f47
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f49
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f50
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f51
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f52
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f57
B11	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	This specific label encompasses all the brickfall in unit J7. The brickfall is the same as the brickfall 1 and brickfall 2 in J6 that slopes across the trench (k200) from the southeast. It is dated to the Mittani period. It is a very dirty brickfall with chunks of bricks, human skeletal remains (e.g. i3, i5, i6)and some small items (e.g. i4, i2). Toward the top of the brickfall the bricks are more degraded forming a "brickmelt" across the top.
I4	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	s160-JPD
I12	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	Based on connections with the brickfall in J2 and J6 the brickfall has been dated to the Mid-Mittani using the ceramics and stratigraphy. The J7 brickfall is known to be part of this brickfall and can be dated to the same strata.

; J7^flst
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f4
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f5
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f6
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f25
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f29
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f35
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f36
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f37
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f38
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f39
A2	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	f40
B11	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	Each stone was thought found sitting relatively isolated in the top 30-70cms of J7. They do not appear to form any distinct shape but may be part of a large arrangement of stones across J2 and area C2. They are large individual limestone stones ranging in size from 40-60cms.
I4	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	s70-JPD
I12	2010-08-11_U811CJC.j	cJC	Based on comparison with similar floating stones in J2.